In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss reports that Iran is threatening escalation as U.S. diplomacy remains stalled, including warnings involving the Strait of Hormuz and critical regional infrastructure. They also examine comments from Jack Keane regarding how Tehran may view upcoming U.S. elections and the strategic risks of prolonged instability. The conversation then shifts to a report on Chinese-backed educational exchange programs, including claims that dozens of schools and universities across the United States are participating in initiatives tied to organizations that promote Marxist-Leninist ideology, raising concerns about influence operations and educational transparency.

Iran is signaling a more aggressive posture as diplomacy with the United States stalls, raising concerns about attacks on energy infrastructure, the Strait of Hormuz, and broader regional stability. At the same time, a new report alleges that Chinese government-backed exchange programs have expanded their reach into dozens of American schools and universities, prompting questions about foreign influence in education.The episode examines two major international challenges: escalating tensions with Iran and concerns over the influence of the Chinese Communist Party in American educational institutions. The discussion focuses on the potential political, economic, and security consequences of both developments.

Topics Covered:

• Iran's threat to move toward a more offensive military posture as diplomacy with the United States stalls.
• Security concerns surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, energy infrastructure, and regional instability.
• Jack Keane's analysis of how Tehran may view upcoming U.S. midterm elections.
• Economic pressure inside Iran, including inflation, unemployment, and concerns about domestic unrest.
• A report alleging that Chinese government-backed exchange programs operate in dozens of U.S. schools and universities.
• Debate over foreign influence, educational partnerships, and transparency involving the Chinese Communist Party.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine newly reported details involving Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan and Troy Jackson in Maine, discuss media coverage of both races, review past records and public statements, and argue that these developments raise significant questions about the Democratic Party's Senate nominees in key states.

New reporting on Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, drives this episode's discussion, as questions arise about an upcoming conference appearance, his past record in Detroit government, and the political implications for Democrats heading into the election cycle. The episode also examines new allegations involving Maine Senate candidate Troy Jackson and what the hosts argue these stories reveal about candidate vetting.The conversation centers on a series of reports involving Abdul El-Sayed, including his scheduled appearance at an event hosted by the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), criticism surrounding other conference participants, and renewed attention on his tenure overseeing Detroit's health department and animal control operations. The hosts also discuss public statements made by members of his family and what they believe those statements indicate about broader political and ideological trends.

Topics Covered:

• Abdul El-Sayed's planned appearance at an ISNA conference in Detroit
• Debate over conference participants and controversy surrounding public criticism of the event
• Review of Detroit animal control euthanasia statistics during El-Sayed's tenure in city government
• Discussion of public comments and activism associated with members of the El-Sayed family
• Reports and allegations involving Maine Senate candidate Troy Jackson
• The hosts' critique of Democratic candidate selection and vetting in Senate races

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: https://x.com/tedcruz

X: 

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss challenges to current gender policies in women's sports, reactions to recent WNBA-related controversies, comments from public figures on athletics and gender identity, and the broader political implications surrounding these debates. They also examine remarks from Democratic candidates and progressive political figures on masculinity, football, religion, and cultural issues as campaigns for future elections begin to take shape.

The WNBA's policies on gender eligibility are facing new scrutiny after former NBA players announced plans to declare for future WNBA draft eligibility. The debate has reignited broader questions about fairness in women's sports, competitive balance, and how athletic organizations define eligibility standards.At the center of the discussion are public challenges involving professional women's basketball, reactions from athletes and commentators, and growing pressure on sports leagues to clarify their policies. The conversation also expands into larger cultural and political debates about gender, athletics, and public discourse.

Topics Covered:

• Former NBA players Enes Freedom Kanter and Royce White announcing plans to pursue WNBA eligibility
• Debate over gender eligibility standards in women's professional sports
• Clay Travis's public challenge involving the WNBA and high school basketball teams
• Criticism of progressive views on masculinity and football from Democratic candidates
• Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's positioning ahead of potential future national campaigns
• Religion, education, and faith-related comments by Democratic Senate candidates

The Bottom Line: Senator Ted Cruz argues that current gender-identity policies in sports create conflicts that leagues will eventually be forced to address directly. He and Ben Ferguson also contend that several Democratic candidates are moderating or obscuring past positions as they seek broader electoral support

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: https://x.com/tedcruz

X: 

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz explains his decision to delete a prior episode after learning that an 82% miscarriage statistic tied to COVID vaccination claims was inaccurate. Ted and Ben discuss the underlying study, the subsequent correction, and their view that public officials should be held accountable for contradictory public and private statements. The discussion then turns to election integrity, voter registration policies in Minnesota, and a series of Democratic candidates running in Senate races across the country. The hosts examine positions on immigration, gender-related healthcare policies, abortion, religion, and campaign strategy, arguing that these races reveal significant ideological divisions heading into the election season.

A correction to a widely discussed COVID vaccine statistic leads Ted Cruz to explain why a previous episode was removed and outlines the data issues behind a claim about miscarriage rates following vaccination during pregnancy. He argues that accuracy matters and walks listeners through the study, the criticism it received, and why the specific figure cited could not be supported.The conversation then shifts to the 2026 election landscape, with a focus on several Democratic Senate candidates and the policy positions that Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson describe as part of a broader ideological shift within the Democratic Party.

Topics Covered:

• Correction and removal of a previous episode citing an inaccurate COVID vaccine miscarriage statistic
• Debate over public and private statements from Anthony Fauci regarding pregnancy-related vaccine concerns
• Minnesota voter registration and voter-vouching policies discussed through undercover reporting by James O'Keefe
• Senate candidate debates involving immigration, healthcare, and gender-related medical policies
• Arguments surrounding late-term abortion legislation and public opinion on abortion policy
• Religion, faith, and political messaging in several high-profile Senate campaigns

The Bottom Line: According to Ted Cruz, correcting factual errors is essential to maintaining credibility, even when the broader argument remains unchanged. He and Ben Ferguson also contend that several Democratic Senate candidates represent a significantly more progressive ideological direction ahead of the upcoming elections.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: 

 In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine the allegations surrounding the reported “Round River” assessment, the FBI’s review of related activities, and broader concerns about transparency, accountability, and political bias within government institutions. They also shift to escalating tensions with Iran, discussing statements from a senior adviser to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps suggesting Tehran could seek to prolong its confrontation with the United States in an effort to outlast President Donald Trump. The conversation explores U.S. pressure tactics against Iran, claims about economic strain on the regime, and reports of ongoing threats against the president.

A newly disclosed report about an alleged FBI and intelligence operation called “Round River” is raising questions about how public figures were categorized during investigations tied to Russian disinformation and the Biden family Ukraine scandal. According to the report discussed in this episode, prominent Republicans and conservative organizations were allegedly labeled as “conduits” of disinformation, while leading Democrats were categorized as “targets.” The controversy centers on a spreadsheet reportedly recovered from U.S. intelligence files and released by the White House Government Transparency Task Force. The document has sparked debate over whether political affiliation influenced how individuals and organizations were treated by federal agencies. 

Topics Covered:

• The reported FBI and intelligence assessment known as “Round River”
• Allegations that public figures were categorized as “conduits” or “targets” of disinformation
• The White House Government Transparency Task Force document release
• FBI reviews involving the Foreign Influence Task Force
• Iran’s reported strategy to prolong confrontation with the United States
• President Trump’s pressure campaign, sanctions, and blockade strategy against Iran

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A reported Iranian assassination threat against Donald Trump led to an extraordinary security operation following a NATO summit in Turkey, according to new reporting discussed in this episode. The account describes a complex deception involving multiple aircraft, a decoy Air Force One, and an effort to conceal the president’s actual movements from potential adversaries.The story has sparked debate over presidential security, government secrecy, and the seriousness of threats directed at the commander in chief. The hosts argue that the operation demonstrates the extent of the risks facing the president and highlights the challenges involved in protecting national leaders from foreign threats.

In this episode Ben examines reporting from the Washington Post describing how security officials allegedly moved Donald Trump from a publicly observed aircraft to a separate military jet using an airport catering truck as part of a broader deception plan. They discuss the reported Iranian threat, media reaction to the operation, the role of secrecy in presidential protection, and the broader national security implications raised by the incident.

Topics Covered:

• Reported Iranian assassination threat against Donald Trump
• Security operation following the NATO summit in Turkey
• Use of a decoy Air Force One aircraft and alternate transport methods
• Reporting from the Washington Post and coverage by CNN
• Debate over secrecy, deception, and presidential security protocols
• Broader concerns about Iran and U.S. national security

The Bottom Line: Ben Ferguson argues that the reported operation demonstrates how seriously U.S. security officials viewed the threat environment surrounding Donald Trump and defends the use of secrecy and deception as necessary tools for presidential protectionPlease Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson analyze the rise of democratic socialism within Democratic politics, debate anti-Israel activism on the left, examine comments from AOC and other progressive figures, and discuss the growing controversy over gender eligibility rules in women’s sports and the WNBA. 

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and their growing influence inside the Democratic Party take center stage in this episode, alongside a heated debate over gender eligibility in women’s sports. Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine comments from a DSA leader on taxation, socialism, Israel, and the future direction of the political left. They discuss a recent interview with a DSA co-chair, focusing on the organization’s views on wealth, capitalism, and Israel. Cruz argues that the movement’s policies reflect a broader ideological shift within progressive politics and raises concerns about the DSA’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The conversation then turns to Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, progressive media figures, and the struggle for influence among younger voters inside the modern Democratic coalition. Cruz and Ferguson debate whether increasingly radical political rhetoric is becoming mainstream within parts of the left. The second half of the episode focuses on women’s sports and a new controversy involving former NBA players publicly declaring interest in WNBA eligibility under current gender identity policies. The hosts discuss fairness in competition, reactions from sports leaders, comments from President Donald Trump, and the broader national debate surrounding transgender participation in athletics. 

Topics Covered:

• Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and its policy agenda
• Taxation, socialism, and critiques of capitalism
• Israel, Hamas, and debate over a one-state solution
• Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and progressive political coalitions
• WNBA eligibility rules and transgender athlete controversies
• Clay Travis, Enes Freedom, and fairness in women’s sports

The Bottom Line: Senator Cruz argues that the DSA represents a growing ideological force within the Democratic Party and contends that its positions on capitalism and Israel are increasingly influential. He and Ferguson also argue that women’s sports organizations will face mounting pressure to clarify eligibility standards as the transgender athlete debate continues.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: 

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Cruz and Ben break down the week's biggest political stories, assess debates shaping the Democratic Party, examine the controversy surrounding government-run grocery stores in New York City, and discuss reports that Democratic attorneys general coordinated legal challenges to Donald Trump before his return to office.

A new Democratic Senate candidate in Maine, a proposal for government-run grocery stores in New York City, and newly reported coordination among Democratic attorneys general before the 2024 election are at the center of this Week in Review. Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson revisit several of the stories that generated the most discussion during the week and explain why they believe those developments could have broader political consequences. 

The episode begins with the Maine Senate race, where Cruz and Ferguson argue that Democratic leaders replaced one controversial candidate with another who shares many of the same ideological positions. They discuss reactions from national Democratic figures and examine what those endorsements reveal about the direction of the party. The conversation then shifts to New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's proposal for government-run grocery stores. Cruz and Ferguson review details from a public request-for-proposal document, debate the logistics of operating city-backed stores, and question whether the model could achieve its stated goals without creating new costs and complications.

The episode also highlights commentary from figures including Bill Maher and Van Jones, whose recent remarks are presented as evidence of growing debate within Democratic circles about the party's future direction and messaging. In the final segment, Cruz and Ferguson discuss a report alleging that a coalition of Democratic attorneys general began preparing legal strategies against a potential second Trump administration months before the 2024 election. They examine the timeline, the lawsuits that followed, and what they believe it says about the political and legal battles surrounding President Donald Trump. 

Topics Covered:

• The Maine Senate race and Democratic candidate Troy Jackson
• National Democratic reactions to controversial candidates
• Zohran Mamdani's government-run grocery store proposal
• Public procurement and operational concerns in New York City
• Bill Maher and Van Jones on the future of the Democratic Party
• Reports of coordinated legal action by Democratic attorneys general against Donald Trump

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: 

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss a Senate hearing focused on the Muslim Brotherhood, allegations of ties between certain advocacy organizations and Islamist movements, the Democratic primary victory of Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, cultural controversies surrounding James Talarico's Texas Senate campaign, and reports that Democratic attorneys general coordinated legal strategies against Donald Trump before the 2024 election was decided. They examine the political implications of these developments and argue that each reflects larger battles over national security, cultural values, and the future direction of American politics.

A Senate hearing on the Muslim Brotherhood and its alleged influence in the United States sparks controversy after Democratic members of the subcommittee decline to attend. The discussion raises questions about national security, political alliances, and how terrorism-related concerns are being debated in Washington.

The episode also examines newly surfaced campaign footage involving James Talarico, the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Texas, and a broader debate over cultural issues, LGBTQ events, and the role of identity politics in modern campaigns.

Finally, attention turns to documents reported to show coordination among Democratic state attorneys general to prepare legal challenges against Donald Trump prior to his return to office, raising questions about lawfare, federal authority, and the political use of litigation.

Topics Covered:

• Senate hearing on the Muslim Brotherhood and Democratic boycott of the proceeding
• Testimony regarding CARE, the Holy Land Foundation, and terrorism-related allegations discussed at the hearing
• Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed and concerns raised by hearing witnesses about organizational ties
• James Talarico's Texas Senate campaign and controversy surrounding participation in a Pride event
• Reports of coordinated litigation planning by Democratic attorneys general against Donald Trump
• Debate over national security, political coalitions, and the use of legal challenges in partisan conflicts

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: